Marrying Without A Prenuptial Agreement? Here’s What You Need To Know
Getting married is often considered one of the most significant milestones in one’s life. However, as charming as it may sound, marriage also involves the merging of two individuals’ lives including their finances and assets. While many couples embark on this journey without a prenuptial agreement, they do so without understanding the potential implications of such a decision. This article aims to explore what happens when couples tie the knot without a prenuptial agreement, focusing on the legal and financial aspects that can shape their relationship. From division of assets to spousal support considerations, understanding the consequences of forgoing a prenuptial agreement is crucial for anyone contemplating marriage.
Default Property Law
In the absence of a prenuptial agreement, the Family Law Act (the “Act”) becomes the default guiding framework for marital property in Ontario. The Act governs the division of assets, spousal support, and other financial matters in the event of separation or divorce.
One of the key principles under the Act is equalization of the parties’ net family properties. That is to say, upon the breakdown of a marriage, the spouse with a higher net family property value is obligated to make a payment to the other to achieve a more equitable distribution of assets acquired during the marriage.
Net family property is determined by calculating the difference between the spouses’ respective net worth at the date of separation. The idea behind this is that marriage is a partnership and each party must leave such a partnership with equal finances.
Excluded Property
Generally, the following property does not need to be shared upon a marriage breakdown and is specifically excluded from the equalization calculations:
- Gifts, given to only one of the spouses, from a third party;
- Inheritances, given to only one of the spouses;
- Increase in the value of the gifts and inheritances, where the donor expressly stated that the gift or inheritance was to be excluded from the spouse’s net family property;
- The increase in the value of a property (other than a matrimonial home), where the property can be traced to an excluded property;
- Money received as a result of a personal injury claim;
- Proceeds of a life insurance policy, paid or payable on the death of the insured;
- Property that the spouses agreed to be excluded in a marriage contract such as a prenuptial agreement.
Gifts and inheritance – after marriage- excluded
Gifts and inheritances become exempt from the inclusion in a spouse’s net family property if they are acquired from a third party post-marriage, and the donor explicitly intended that such a gift or inheritance for the individual spouse rather than the entire family. Typically, any appreciation for the value of these gifts and inheritances remains non-shared. If the non-shareable gift or inheritance is transferred by that spouse to another asset, that asset is also solely owned by the spouse. However, if the gift or inheritance is sold or transferred to another asset that is jointly owned with the other spouse, or the proceeds of such a sale are used towards a joint property such as upgrading a matrimonial home, such a gift or inheritance loses it exclusionary status and will be included in calculating the spouse’s net family property value.
Gifts and inheritance – before marriage- deducted
On the contrary, gifts or inheritances obtained before marriage will not be automatically excluded from the net family property calculation, instead, their value at the time of the marriage is subtracted from the spouse’s net family property, and any subsequent increase in the value is subject to sharing.
Similarly, gifts received from a spouse are treated as part of the net family property and are therefore included in the calculation.
Matrimonial Home
The treatment of the matrimonial home is a crucial aspect of the Family Law Act when equalizing the parties’ net family property. The Family Law Act recognizes the significance of the matrimonial home in the lives of couples and the emotional ties associated with it.
Section 18(1) of the Family Law Act defines a matrimonial home as every property in which either spouse has an interest and which is currently, or was at the time of separation, “ordinarily occupied by the person and his or her spouse as their family residence.” Under this definition, more than one home can qualify as a matrimonial home. If the parties have a cottage that they also use regularly as a family, and were using at the time of separation, the cottage will be a second matrimonial home. But if the cottage was for the most part used only by one of the spouses, it may not be considered a matrimonial home for the purposes of the Act.
Section 28(1) specifies that the provisions regarding matrimonial homes apply only to property in Ontario. Therefore, any family homes located outside the province will not be given special treatment as matrimonial homes and will be treated like all other family property.
In Ontario, the matrimonial home is treated differently than all other assets under the equalization process. Its value is never deducted from a spouse’s net family property as a date of marriage asset, even if the spouse owned the property at the time of marriage; rather, the home’s value is always included in the date of separation assets of the spouse who owns the home (or divided equally between the two spouses if title is held jointly). This would make the home-owning spouse’s net family property substantially higher than it would be if the home were deducted as a date of marriage asset.
Having a prenuptial agreement in a situation is beneficial to protect your assets, where the matrimonial home was purchased and brought into the marriage by one spouse with their hard-earned money.
Shared Assets And Debts
When entering into a marriage, couples often focus on the joys of shared experiences and building a life together. However, it is crucial to understand the legal implications, particularly in the absence of a prenuptial agreement.
Without a prenuptial agreement, assets acquired during the marriage are generally regarded as joint property. This means that both spouses share equal ownership rights to these assets. Whether it’s a home, investments, or other assets obtained during the marriage, both partners have a stake in these shared possessions.
The concept of joint property often implies equal ownership rights. This equal treatment in ownership can extend to various aspects of the couple’s financial portfolio, promoting a sense of shared responsibility and partnership.
On the flip side, in the absence of a prenuptial agreement, debts incurred during the marriage are considered shared responsibilities. This includes loans, credit cards, debts, lines of credit and other financial obligations incurred by either spouse. The impact of shared debts can be significant, affecting both spouses’ credit scores and financial stability. Since shared debts mean both spouses are responsible for repayment, any missed payment by one partner may cause the financial institution to hound both partners. Therefore the importance of creating prenuptial agreements in such a scenario is heightened.
Spousal Support
Without a prenuptial agreement, spousal support in Ontario is determined by the Family Law Act. The Act provides guidelines for calculating spousal support based on factors such as the length of the marriage, the roles each spouse played during the marriage, and their respective financial positions at the time of separation.
Length Of Marriage
The duration of the marriage is a crucial factor in spousal support calculations. Longer marriages may lead to different considerations, and the Act provides the court with discretion to tailor spousal support orders to meet the specific circumstances of each case.
Disparity In Financial Means
Spousal support is often influenced by the financial disparities between spouses. If one spouse has a significantly higher income or greater financial resources than the other, the court may order spousal support to help balance the financial scales, allowing both individuals to maintain a reasonable standard of living.
Contributions During The Marriage
The Act considers contributions of each spouse to the marriage when determining spousal support. This includes financial contributions but also non-financial contributions such as homemaking and childraising.
Standard Of Living During The Marriage
The Act aims to ensure that both spouses can maintain a standard of living similar to what they experienced during the marriage. This principle focuses on spousal support to help the finally disadvantaged spouse transition into post-divorce life without suffering a significant decline in their standard of living.
Imputing Income
In cases where one spouse is not working to their full capacity or has intentionally reduced their income, the court may impute them with an income depending on their qualifications and past work experience for the purposes of calculating spousal support. This means that the court attributes a certain level of income to that spouse for the purpose of support calculations.
Changing Circumstances
Spousal support orders are not necessarily permanent. If there are significant changes in the circumstances of either spouse, such as change in income, employment or remarriage, it may be possible to seek a variation in the spousal support order.
Having a prenuptial agreement in place saves you the possibility of paying spousal support.
Parenting And Child Support
Prenuptial agreements primarily focus on the financial aspects, such as division of property and spousal support. The law specifically excludes decision-making responsibility and parenting time (formerly referred to as custody and access respectively) from the scope of prenuptial agreements. Even if these clauses were to be included in a prenuptial agreement, the court may override it.
The legal system prioritizes the best interests of the child, and decisions regarding decision-making responsibility and parenting time are made based on the child’s best interests.
Similarly, child support is based on the Federal Child Support Guidelines, after considering the parents’ incomes. Here again the courts are guided by the best interests of the child. In cases where either party has children from a previous relationship, a prenuptial agreement allows parties the opportunity to clearly state whether they intend to offer support for each other’s children or if each party will be individually responsible for the financial obligations of their biological children. Additionally, the agreement can detail specific arrangements for child support concerning any children born to or adopted by the parties either before or during the marriage.
In conclusion, the decision to forego a prenuptial agreement is a significant one that carries both legal and financial implications for couples planning to get married. Without a prenuptial agreement, default laws come into play, and various aspects of marriage from asset division to spousal support are subject to the laws of the jurisdiction in which the couple resides.
While a prenuptial agreement offers a customized path, our experienced team at Nazarian Law will guide you through the legal implications, emphasizing open communication and proactive steps to safeguard your individual interests. Start by booking a complimentary discovery call with us.
—————————————–
Disclaimer
The content provided in this article or blog is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or to replace the advice of a qualified legal professional. While we strive to provide accurate and current information, the law is complex and constantly changing, and each person’s circumstances are unique. Therefore, you should not rely on this information as a substitute for professional legal advice. This information does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and our law firm. We strongly recommend that you consult with a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction to understand your legal rights and obligations. Always seek legal advice before making any decisions that may impact your legal rights or obligations.
